Study Plans33 min read

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Gives the Best IELTS Writing Feedback?

By Lingo Copilot Speaking Team

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Gives the Best IELTS Writing Feedback?

I tested ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini with the exact same IELTS Task 2 essay and prompt. Same mistakes. Same request for feedback. Very different results.

In this guide, I’ll show you exactly what each AI returned, what surprised me, and which one I’d actually recommend for IELTS Writing preparation.

Spoiler: The best AI for IELTS Writing feedback isn’t the one you’d expect.

The Test Setup

I wrote an IELTS Task 2 essay with intentional mistakes—the kind of errors a Band 6 candidate might make. Then I used the same prompt across all three AI tools.

The Essay Question

Some people believe that technology has made our lives too complex, and the solution is to live a simpler life without technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Write at least 250 words.

My Test Essay (With Intentional Errors)

Here’s the essay I submitted to all three AI tools:

In today’s world, technology is everywhere and some people think it make our life too complicated. They believe we should live simple life without technology. I partly agree with this opinion because technology has both advantage and disadvantage.

Firstly, technology has made our life more complex in some ways. For example, people always checking their phone and social media, and they cannot relax properly. Moreover, there are too many application and website that we need to remember password for. This is very stressful for many people specially older generation. My grandmother always complain that she cannot understand how to use smartphone.

However, I disagree that we should live without technology completely. Technology help us in many important ways. For instance, we can communicate with family members who live in abroad easily through video call. Also, technology make our work more efficient and save a lot of time. Without computer and internet, many jobs cannot be done.

In my opinion, the solution is not to reject technology but to use it wisely. We should learn to control how much time we spend on device and choose which technology is really necessary for our life. For example, we can turn off notification and set specific time for checking social media.

In conclusion, while technology can make life complex, living completely without it is not practical solution. Instead, we should find balance between using technology and maintaining simple lifestyle.

The essay contains common Band 6 errors including subject-verb agreement issues (“it make,” “technology help”), missing articles (“live simple life”), plural errors (“too many application”), and spelling mistakes (“specially” instead of “especially”).

Important: The essay is also slightly under 250 words (236 words) to test whether each AI would catch this issue.

The Prompt I Used

You are an IELTS examiner. Evaluate my Task 2 essay.

The task is:
Some people believe that technology has made our lives too complex, and the solution is to live a simpler life without technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Write at least 250 words.

My response:
[Essay above]

Evaluate based on:
- Task Response (Did I fully address all parts? Is my position clear throughout?)
- Coherence and Cohesion (Is the essay well-organized? Are ideas logically connected?)
- Lexical Resource (Is vocabulary varied and precise? Are there spelling errors?)
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (Are sentences varied? Are there grammatical errors?)

Give me:
1. Estimated band score for each criterion
2. Overall band score
3. What I did well
4. Specific mistakes with corrections
5. One paragraph rewritten at Band 8+ level
6. Three vocabulary upgrades I could use next time

Now let’s see what each AI returned.

ChatGPT Results

Model tested: GPT-4o (free tier)

Scores Given

Criterion Score
Task Response 6.5
Coherence and Cohesion 6.5
Lexical Resource 6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy 5.5–6.0
Overall 6.0–6.5

What ChatGPT Said I Did Well

  • Clear opinion stated and maintained
  • Relevant examples (social media, passwords, grandmother, video calls)
  • Logical paragraph structure
  • Appropriate length (over 250 words)
  • Balanced discussion (advantages and disadvantages)

Errors ChatGPT Caught

ChatGPT identified 7 specific errors:

  1. “it make” → “it makes” (subject-verb agreement)
  2. “live simple life” → “live a simple life” (article)
  3. “advantage and disadvantage” → “advantages and disadvantages” (plural)
  4. “people always checking” → “people are always checking” (verb form)
  5. “live in abroad” → “live abroad” (preposition)
  6. “specially” → “especially” (spelling)
  7. “not practical solution” → “not a practical solution” (article)

ChatGPT’s Band 8+ Rewrite

However, I disagree with the idea that people should completely abandon technology. Modern technology plays a vital role in our daily lives. For example, it allows us to communicate easily with family members who live abroad through video calls. In addition, technological tools significantly improve workplace efficiency and help save time. Without computers and the internet, many professions would struggle to function effectively in today’s globalized world.

Vocabulary Upgrades Suggested

  1. “make life complex” → “increase the complexity of daily life”
  2. “use technology wisely” → “use technology in a balanced and responsible manner”
  3. “not practical solution” → “an unrealistic/impractical approach”

What ChatGPT Missed

The word count issue. ChatGPT actually said I wrote “over 250 words” when the essay was under 250 words. This is factually incorrect.

Gemini Results

Models tested: Gemini Flash, Gemini Thinking, Gemini Pro (all free)

Scores Given (Varied by Model)

Criterion Flash Thinking Pro
Task Response 6.0 6.0 5.0
Coherence and Cohesion 6.0 6.0 6.0
Lexical Resource 5.0 5.5 5.5
Grammatical Range 5.0 5.5 5.0
Overall 5.5 6.0 5.5

Gemini gave the strictest scores overall—lower than both ChatGPT and Claude.

What Gemini Said I Did Well

  • Clear structure (introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion)
  • Clear opinion (“partly agree” maintained throughout)
  • Relevant examples (older generation, video calls)

Errors Gemini Caught

Gemini identified 5–6 specific errors:

  1. “it make our life” → “it makes our lives”
  2. “live simple life” → “live a simpler life”
  3. “live in abroad” → “live abroad”
  4. “too many application” → “too many applications”
  5. “specially” → “especially”

Gemini’s Band 8+ Rewrite (Thinking Model)

Admittedly, the digital era has introduced a layer of complexity that can be overwhelming. The constant bombardment of notifications and the pressure to remain perpetually ‘connected’ via social media often lead to a state of mental fatigue, preventing individuals from truly disconnecting. Furthermore, the modern necessity of managing countless digital identities and passwords creates a cognitive burden that is particularly taxing for the elderly. This digital divide can lead to feelings of frustration and exclusion for those not raised in the internet age.

Vocabulary Upgrades Suggested

  1. “Helpful” → “Indispensable”
  2. “Bad thing” → “Detrimental”
  3. “Big change” → “Revolutionized”

What Gemini Got Right (That Others Missed)

Gemini Thinking and Gemini Pro both caught the word count issue.

Gemini Thinking said: “Your essay is approximately 225 words, which is under the 250-word requirement. This results in a penalty.”

Gemini Pro said: “The essay is under the word limit (approx. 220 words), which significantly lowers your score.”

These were the only models that noticed this problem.

Claude Results

Models tested: Claude Sonnet and Claude Haiku (both free)

Scores Given

Criterion Sonnet Haiku
Task Response 6.0 6.5
Coherence and Cohesion 6.0 7.0
Lexical Resource 5.5 6.0
Grammatical Range 5.5 6.5
Overall 6.0 6.5

Claude Haiku was the most generous scorer. Claude Sonnet was more conservative.

What Claude Said I Did Well

  • Clear position stated and maintained
  • Relevant examples (grandmother with smartphone, video calls)
  • Balanced argument presenting both sides
  • Proper introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion

Errors Claude Caught

Claude Sonnet identified 10–13 specific errors—the most of any AI tested:

  1. “it make our life” → “it makes our lives” (subject-verb agreement + plural)
  2. “live simple life” → “live a simple life” (article)
  3. “advantage and disadvantage” → “advantages and disadvantages” (plural)
  4. “people always checking” → “people are always checking” (missing auxiliary verb)
  5. “too many application and website” → “too many applications and websites” (plural)
  6. “specially” → “especially” (spelling)
  7. “complain” → “complains” (subject-verb agreement)
  8. “Technology help” → “Technology helps” (subject-verb agreement)
  9. “live in abroad” → “live abroad” (preposition)
  10. “technology make” → “technology makes” (subject-verb agreement)
  11. “on device” → “on devices” (plural)
  12. “not practical solution” → “not a practical solution” (article)
  13. “simple lifestyle” → “a simple lifestyle” (article)

Claude’s Band 8+ Rewrite (Sonnet)

However, I disagree with the idea that people should completely abandon technology. Modern technology plays a vital role in our daily lives. For example, it allows us to communicate easily with family members who live abroad through video calls. In addition, technological tools significantly improve workplace efficiency and help save time. Without computers and the internet, many professions would struggle to function effectively in today’s globalized world.

What made Claude’s rewrite different: Claude didn’t just provide a better version—it explained exactly why each change improved the writing:

  • More sophisticated vocabulary (contend, renouncing, feasible, facilitates)
  • Varied sentence structures with subordinate clauses
  • More precise language (“geographically distant” vs. “live in abroad”)
  • Smoother cohesion with transitional phrases

Vocabulary Upgrades Suggested

  1. “make life complex” → “exacerbate the complexity of daily life” or “render existence more intricate”
  2. “too many apps” → “the proliferation of digital applications”
  3. “use technology wisely” → “employ technology judiciously” or “leverage technology in a measured manner”

What Claude Missed

The word count issue. Like ChatGPT, Claude didn’t mention that the essay was under 250 words.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature ChatGPT Gemini Claude
Overall Score Given 6.0–6.5 5.5–6.0 6.0–6.5
Models Tested 1 3 2
Errors Caught 7 5–6 10–13
Clean Format ✓ ✓ ✓
Detailed Error List ○ ○ ✓
Band 8+ Rewrite ✓ ✓ ✓
Explained WHY It’s Better ○ ○ ✓
Caught Word Count Issue ✗ ✓ ✗
Vocabulary Suggestions ✓ ✓ ✓
Improvement Tips ○ ○ ✓

Legend: ✓ = Yes | ○ = Partial | ✗ = No

Two Important Notes

Before I share my recommendation, there are two things you should know about these results.

1. AI Scoring Format Is Wrong

Every AI tool gave “point-5” scores for individual criteria—like “Task Response: 6.5” or “Grammar: 5.5.”

This isn’t how real IELTS works.

In actual IELTS scoring, each criterion (Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy) is scored in whole numbers only: 5, 6, 7, 8, etc.

Point-5 scores only appear in the section totals (Speaking score, Writing score) and the overall band score.

So when an AI says “Grammar: 5.5,” that’s not a valid IELTS criterion score.

2. The Word Count Penalty Has Changed

While Gemini caught the word count issue—and ChatGPT and Claude missed it—this finding is less important than it seems.

The strict word count penalty was removed from IELTS some years ago.

Being significantly under the word count can still affect your score (because you might not develop ideas fully), but there’s no longer an automatic penalty for writing 240 words instead of 250.

My essay was only slightly under (236 words). In a real exam, this probably wouldn’t significantly impact the score—as long as the ideas are well-developed.

My Honest Opinion

I’m not an ex-IELTS examiner. I’m someone who’s taken IELTS multiple times and seen many people’s IELTS journeys.

Based on the essay I submitted, I’d estimate the real score would be around Band 7.0—higher than any AI tool predicted.

Here’s my reasoning:

  • The essay has clear structure and maintains a consistent position
  • Ideas are relevant and supported with examples
  • The errors are noticeable but don’t impede communication
  • The slight word count issue is negligible

All three AI tools scored too strictly, especially Gemini.

But here’s the thing: As I’ve said in other posts, the band score is not the best value you get from AI feedback.

AI scores aren’t accurate. They can’t replicate human examiner judgment. (I explained this in detail in my post about AI scoring accuracy.)

The real value is in the feedback itself:

  • What specific errors did you make?
  • How can you fix them?
  • What does a Band 8+ version look like?
  • What vocabulary should you use instead?

That’s what matters for improvement.

My Recommendation: Claude Sonnet

If I had to choose one AI tool for IELTS Writing feedback, I’d choose Claude Sonnet.

Here’s why:

  1. Most errors caught (10–13) — Claude identified significantly more mistakes than ChatGPT (7) or Gemini (5–6). More corrections = more learning opportunities.

  2. Best explanations — Claude didn’t just say “this is wrong.” It explained why the correction is better and how it affects your score.

  3. Detailed Band 8+ rewrite — Claude showed me a better version AND explained what makes it Band 8+: sophisticated vocabulary, varied sentence structures, precise language, smooth cohesion.

  4. Actionable improvement tips — Claude provided specific recommendations for reaching Band 7+, not just vague advice.

Yes, Claude missed the word count issue. But since that penalty has been removed anyway, I’d rather have an AI that catches more actual errors and explains them better.

Full AI Responses (For Reference)

If you want to see exactly what each AI returned, I’ve included the complete responses below.

ChatGPT Full Response

Below is an IELTS Task 2 examiner-style evaluation, following the official band descriptors closely.

1. Estimated Band Score by Criterion

Task Response: Band 6.5

  • You address all parts of the task.
  • Your position (“partly agree”) is clear and consistent.
  • Ideas are relevant, but some arguments could be developed more deeply with clearer explanations and examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

  • The essay has a clear structure: introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion.
  • Paragraphing is logical.
  • Linking words are used (“Firstly”, “However”, “In conclusion”), but cohesion is sometimes basic and repetitive.
  • Some sentences feel list-like rather than smoothly connected.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

  • Vocabulary is appropriate but limited.
  • Several repetitions (“technology”, “life”, “make”).
  • Some word form and collocation errors.
  • Meaning is always clear, which is positive.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5–6.0

  • You use mostly simple sentence structures.
  • Frequent subject–verb agreement, article, and plural errors.
  • Errors do not block communication, but they are noticeable and frequent.

2. Overall Estimated Band Score: 6.0–6.5

Most likely Band 6.0, but close to 6.5 if grammar accuracy improves slightly.

3. What You Did Well ✅

  • Clear opinion stated and maintained
  • Relevant examples (social media, passwords, grandmother, video calls)
  • Logical paragraph structure
  • Appropriate length (over 250 words)
  • Balanced discussion (advantages and disadvantages)

These are strong Band 6+ features.

4. Specific Mistakes with Corrections ❌➡️✅

Here are common errors that reduce your score:

  1. Subject–verb agreement

    • ❌ technology is everywhere and some people think it make our life too complicated
    • ✅ technology is everywhere and some people think it makes our lives too complicated

  2. Articles and plurals

    • ❌ live simple life
    • ✅ live a simple life

  3. Word form

    • ❌ has both advantage and disadvantage
    • ✅ has both advantages and disadvantages

  4. Verb tense / form

    • ❌ people always checking their phone
    • ✅ people are always checking their phones

  5. Prepositions

    • ❌ family members who live in abroad
    • ✅ family members who live abroad

  6. Spelling

    • ❌ specially older generation
    • ✅ especially the older generation

  7. Article + noun

    • ❌ not practical solution
    • ✅ not a practical solution

5. One Paragraph Rewritten at Band 8+ Level

Original paragraph (second body paragraph):

However, I disagree that we should live without technology completely. Technology help us in many important ways. For instance, we can communicate with family members who live in abroad easily through video call. Also, technology make our work more efficient and save a lot of time. Without computer and internet, many jobs cannot be done.

Band 8+ Version:

However, I disagree with the idea that people should completely abandon technology. Modern technology plays a vital role in our daily lives. For example, it allows us to communicate easily with family members who live abroad through video calls. In addition, technological tools significantly improve workplace efficiency and help save time. Without computers and the internet, many professions would struggle to function effectively in today’s globalized world.

6. Three Vocabulary Upgrades for Next Time 🔤

Try replacing basic words with these higher-band alternatives:

  1. “make life complex” → increase the complexity of daily life
  2. “use technology wisely” → use technology in a balanced and responsible manner
  3. “not practical solution” → an unrealistic / impractical approach

Final Examiner Comment 📝

You are solidly at Band 6 level, with clear potential for Band 7.
To improve:

  • Focus on grammar accuracy
  • Use more complex sentence structures
  • Upgrade vocabulary and avoid repetition

Claude Sonnet Full Response

IELTS Task 2 Essay Evaluation

Band Scores

Task Response: 6.0

  • You address all parts of the task and present a clear position (partial agreement)
  • Your position is maintained throughout, though development could be deeper
  • Main ideas are relevant but need more detailed support and examples

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

  • Overall organization is logical with clear paragraphing
  • Basic linking devices are used, though sometimes mechanically
  • Progression of ideas is generally clear but could be smoother

Lexical Resource: 5.5

  • Vocabulary is adequate for the task but limited in range
  • Several spelling and word form errors affect clarity
  • Some attempts at less common vocabulary but with inaccuracies

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 5.5

  • Mix of simple and complex sentence structures attempted
  • Frequent grammatical errors that sometimes impede communication
  • Articles, subject-verb agreement, and verb forms need attention

Overall Band Score: 6.0

What You Did Well

  1. Clear structure: You have a proper introduction, body paragraphs with distinct points, and a conclusion
  2. Relevant examples: Your examples (grandmother with smartphone, video calls with family) are relatable and support your points
  3. Balanced argument: You successfully present both sides before giving your opinion, which suits the “to what extent” question type
  4. Clear position: Your partial agreement stance is evident from the introduction through to the conclusion

Specific Mistakes with Corrections

Grammatical Errors:

  1. “it make our life” → “it makes our life” (subject-verb agreement)
  2. “live simple life” → “live a simple life” (missing article)
  3. “both advantage and disadvantage” → “both advantages and disadvantages” (plural needed)
  4. “people always checking” → “people are always checking” (missing auxiliary verb)
  5. “there are too many application” → “there are too many applications” (plural form)
  6. “specially” → “especially” (spelling/word choice)
  7. “who live in abroad” → “who live abroad” (no preposition needed)
  8. “technology make” → “technology makes” (subject-verb agreement)
  9. “save” → “saves” (subject-verb agreement)
  10. “on device” → “on devices” (plural needed)

Lexical Errors:

  1. “advantage and disadvantage” → “advantages and disadvantages” or better: “both benefits and drawbacks”
  2. “specially” → “especially” or “particularly”
  3. “complain” → “complains” (verb form)

Style Issues:

  1. “In today’s world” - This is a very common opening; try to be more specific
  2. “For example” and “For instance” used repetitively - vary your linking phrases

Body Paragraph 1 Rewritten at Band 8+ Level

Admittedly, technology has introduced considerable complexity into modern life. The ubiquity of smartphones, for instance, has created an expectation of constant connectivity, leaving many individuals feeling unable to fully disconnect and relax. Furthermore, the proliferation of digital platforms has resulted in “password fatigue,” whereby users must memorize dozens of login credentials for various applications and websites. This technological burden disproportionately affects older generations, who often struggle to adapt to rapidly evolving interfaces and systems. My grandmother, for example, frequently expresses frustration at her inability to navigate even basic smartphone functions, illustrating how technology can alienate those less digitally literate.

What makes this Band 8+:

  • More sophisticated vocabulary (ubiquity, proliferation, disproportionately, digitally literate)
  • Complex sentence structures with subordinate clauses
  • Cohesive devices that flow naturally (whereby, furthermore, for instance)
  • More precise expressions (constant connectivity, password fatigue, technological burden)
  • Error-free grammar throughout

Three Vocabulary Upgrades for Next Time

  1. Instead of “complicated/complex”:

    • “has introduced considerable complexity”
    • “has rendered modern life increasingly intricate”
    • “has added layers of complication to daily routines”

  2. Instead of “help us”:

    • “facilitates communication”
    • “enhances our productivity”
    • “enables us to…”
    • “proves invaluable for…”

  3. Instead of “use it wisely”:

    • “adopt a more discerning approach to technology”
    • “exercise digital mindfulness”
    • “cultivate a balanced relationship with technology”
    • “employ technology judiciously”

Key Recommendations for Improvement

  1. Proofread for basic grammar: Focus on subject-verb agreement and article usage
  2. Expand your examples: Give more specific details to reach 250+ words more comfortably
  3. Vary sentence openings: Don’t start every sentence with the subject
  4. Use more precise vocabulary: Replace general words like “help,” “make,” and “thing”
  5. Practice complex sentences: Use relative clauses, conditional sentences, and participle phrases

With focused work on grammar accuracy and vocabulary range, you could realistically achieve Band 6.5-7.0. Keep practicing!

Claude Haiku Full Response

IELTS Task 2 Essay Evaluation

1. Estimated Band Scores by Criterion

Task Response: 6.5⁄9
You address the question and present a clear position (partly agree), but your ideas lack depth and development. Arguments are somewhat basic, and you could have explored counterarguments or nuanced perspectives more thoroughly.

Coherence and Cohesion: 7⁄9
Your essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing and adequate linking words (Firstly, However, For instance). However, transitions between ideas could be smoother, and some paragraphs feel underdeveloped.

Lexical Resource: 6⁄9
Vocabulary is functional but repetitive and safe. You use “technology” repeatedly without synonyms, and phrases like “make our life” are basic. Some word choices lack precision (e.g., “too many application”).

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6.5⁄9
Several grammatical errors disrupt clarity. You demonstrate basic sentence structures but lack sophisticated constructions. Range is limited—mostly simple and compound sentences.

Overall Band Score: 6.5⁄9 (Between IELTS 6 and 7)

2. What You Did Well

  • Clear position: Your “partly agree” stance is stated upfront and maintained throughout, which examiners appreciate.
  • Relevant examples: Your grandmother’s example and the social media illustration are concrete and relatable.
  • Logical structure: Five-paragraph format with introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion is appropriate.
  • Practical solution: Your suggestion about using technology wisely shows critical thinking beyond simply accepting or rejecting it.

3. Specific Mistakes with Corrections

Error Original Correction Type
Subject-verb agreement “technology is… some people think it make” “it makes” Grammar
Article error “live simple life” “live a simpler life” Grammar
Spelling “application” (plural context) “applications” Spelling
Preposition “specially older generation” “especially older generations” Word choice/Grammar
Article omission “Through video call” “through a video call” Grammar
Verb form “make our work more efficient and save” “makes our work… and saves” Agreement
Spelling “complain that she cannot” “complains” (present tense) Grammar
Awkward phrasing “the solution is not to reject technology but to use it wisely” More concise: “rather than rejecting technology entirely, we should use it judiciously” Style

4. One Paragraph Rewritten at Band 8+ Level

Your version:
“However, I disagree that we should live without technology completely. Technology help us in many important ways. For instance, we can communicate with family members who live in abroad easily through video call. Also, technology make our work more efficient and save a lot of time. Without computer and internet, many jobs cannot be done.”

Band 8+ version:
“Conversely, I contend that completely renouncing technology is neither feasible nor desirable. Technology facilitates numerous essential functions in contemporary society. For example, it enables instantaneous communication with geographically distant relatives through video conferencing, strengthening familial bonds despite physical separation. Furthermore, technological tools significantly enhance workplace productivity and streamline time-consuming tasks that would otherwise be labour-intensive. Indeed, countless professions—from medicine to finance—would become entirely unviable without digital infrastructure.”

Why this is stronger:

  • More sophisticated vocabulary (contend, renouncing, feasible, facilitates, instantaneous, labour-intensive)
  • Varied sentence structures (complex sentences with subordinate clauses)
  • More precise language (“geographically distant” vs. “live in abroad”)
  • Smoother cohesion with transitional phrases (Conversely, Furthermore, Indeed)
  • Eliminates repetitive language and grammatical errors

5. Three Vocabulary Upgrades for Next Time

Basic Word Upgraded Alternative Context
“make our life complicated” “exacerbate the complexity of modern life” or “render existence more intricate” When discussing negative effects
“too many apps” “the proliferation of digital applications” or “an overwhelming array of software” When discussing abundance/excess
“use technology wisely” “employ technology judiciously” or “leverage technology in a measured manner” When discussing balanced approach

Additional Tips to Reach Band 7+

  1. Reduce repetition: Replace repeated uses of “technology” with “digital tools,” “innovations,” “modern conveniences,” or “automated systems.”

  2. Vary sentence openings: Instead of starting multiple sentences with “Technology…”, use subordinate clauses: “While technology offers productivity benefits, it simultaneously…”

  3. Add nuance: Move beyond binary arguments. Instead of “technology is good/bad,” explore conditions: “Technology proves beneficial when used purposefully but detrimental when it dominates leisure time.”

  4. Proofread thoroughly: Grammatical errors (especially subject-verb agreement) are heavily penalized. Your phrase “technology… think it make” immediately signals a lower band.

  5. Develop ideas more fully: Each main point deserves 2-3 sentences of explanation and examples, not just one sentence.

You’re close to Band 7—focus on eliminating grammatical errors and upgrading vocabulary, and you’ll reach that level easily.

Gemini Flash Full Response

Hello! As an IELTS examiner, I have evaluated your essay based on the official assessment criteria. You have a clear perspective and your ideas are easy to follow, which is a great foundation.

Here is your formal evaluation:

1. Estimated Band Scores

Criterion Score Reason
Task Response 6.0 You addressed both sides of the argument and your position is clear. However, the development of ideas is somewhat thin.
Coherence & Cohesion 6.0 The essay is organized with logical paragraphing. You used basic linking words (Firstly, However, In conclusion).
Lexical Resource 5.0 The vocabulary is functional but repetitive and very basic. There are frequent spelling/word form errors (e.g., “specially,” “application”).
Grammatical Range & Accuracy 5.0 Many sentences are simple. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and article use (“it make,” “simple life”).
Overall Band Score 5.5 Competent User: You can communicate well, but errors are frequent and vocabulary is limited.

2. What you did well

  • Clear Structure: You followed the standard four-paragraph essay structure (Introduction, Body 1, Body 2, Conclusion), which is essential for a good score.
  • Clear Opinion: Your “partly agree” stance was maintained throughout the essay.
  • Relevant Examples: Mentioning the “older generation” and “video calls” provided concrete support for your arguments.

3. Specific Mistakes & Corrections

Error Correction Why?
”…it make our life…” ”…it makes our lives…” Subject-verb agreement (it makes) and pluralization.
”…live simple life…” ”…live a simpler life…” Missing the article “a” and the comparative “simpler.”
”…live in abroad…” ”…live abroad…” “Abroad” is an adverb; it does not need the preposition “in.”
”…too many application…” ”…too many applications…” “Many” requires a plural noun.
“specially older…” “especially the older…” “Especially” is used to single something out.

4. Band 8+ Rewrite (Body Paragraph 1)

Original: “Firstly, technology has made our life more complex in some ways. For example, people always checking their phone and social media, and they cannot relax properly.”

Rewritten Version:
“To begin with, the ubiquity of digital tools has undeniably increased the complexity of modern existence. The constant influx of notifications from social media platforms often leads to a state of ‘digital overload,’ where individuals find it impossible to disconnect and truly unwind. Furthermore, the sheer volume of digital accounts and passwords required to navigate daily life creates a significant cognitive burden, particularly for the elderly who may find such rapid technological shifts overwhelming rather than helpful.”

5. Three Vocabulary Upgrades

  1. Instead of “Too complex” → Use “Overwhelmingly intricate” or “Digitally cluttered.”
  2. Instead of “Good and bad” → Use “A double-edged sword.”
    • Example: “Technology is often viewed as a double-edged sword in modern society.”
  3. Instead of “Use it wisely” → Use “Exercise moderation” or “Adopt a mindful approach.”

Gemini Thinking Full Response

It is a pleasure to help you with your IELTS preparation. Writing is often the most challenging part of the exam, and you have a solid foundation to build upon. You have a clear structure and your viewpoint is easy to follow, which is a great start.

Here is my evaluation of your essay based on the official IELTS criteria.

1. Estimated Band Scores

Criterion Estimated Band Score Reason for Score
Task Response 6.0 You addressed all parts of the prompt and your position is clear. However, your essay is approximately 225 words, which is under the 250-word requirement. This results in a penalty.
Coherence & Cohesion 6.0 The essay is well-organized into logical paragraphs. You use transition words (Firstly, However, In conclusion) effectively, though they are somewhat basic.
Lexical Resource 5.5 Your vocabulary is functional but repetitive (e.g., using “technology” and “life” very often). There are several minor word-form errors.
Grammatical Range 5.5 Most sentences are simple or compound. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and article usage (“a”, “the”).
Overall Band Score 6.0 A solid performance that communicates ideas clearly but needs more range and length.

2. What you did well

  • Clear Structure: You followed the standard four/five-paragraph essay structure, which makes it very easy for the examiner to navigate your thoughts.
  • Clear Position: You stated you “partly agree” in the introduction and maintained that balanced view throughout the essay.
  • Relevant Examples: Mentioning the “older generation” and “video calls to family abroad” provides concrete evidence for your points.

3. Specific Mistakes & Corrections

Error in Text Correction Explanation
”…it make our life…” ”…it makes our lives…” Subject-verb agreement (singular “it” takes “makes”).
”…live simple life…” ”…live a simpler life…” You need an article (“a”) before singular countable nouns.
”…has both advantage and disadvantage.” ”…has both advantages and disadvantages.” Use plural forms when speaking in general.
”…people always checking…” ”…people are constantly checking…” You must use an auxiliary verb (“are”) for the present continuous tense.
”…live in abroad…” ”…live abroad…” “Abroad” is an adverb; it does not require the preposition “in.”
”…technology make our work…” ”…technology makes our work…” Subject-verb agreement.

4. Band 8+ Rewrite (Body Paragraph 1)

“Admittedly, the digital era has introduced a layer of complexity that can be overwhelming. The constant bombardment of notifications and the pressure to remain perpetually ‘connected’ via social media often lead to a state of mental fatigue, preventing individuals from truly disconnecting. Furthermore, the modern necessity of managing countless digital identities and passwords creates a cognitive burden that is particularly taxing for the elderly. This digital divide can lead to feelings of frustration and exclusion for those not raised in the internet age.”

5. Three Vocabulary Upgrades for Next Time

  1. Instead of “Helpful”: Use Indispensable
    • Example: “Technology has become indispensable in the modern workplace.”
  2. Instead of “Bad thing”: Use Detrimental
    • Example: “Excessive screen time can have a detrimental effect on mental health.”
  3. Instead of “Big change”: Use Revolutionized
    • Example: “The internet has revolutionized the way we communicate with people overseas.”

Gemini Pro Full Response

Hello! As an IELTS examiner, I have evaluated your essay carefully.

Here is a summary before we look at the details: You have a clear structure and your opinion is easy to understand. However, the essay is under the word limit (approx. 220 words), which significantly lowers your score. Additionally, there are frequent basic grammatical errors regarding subject-verb agreement and articles.

Here is your detailed evaluation.

1. Estimated Band Scores

Criterion Score Reason
Task Response 5.0 You addressed the topic and gave a clear opinion. However, the essay is under 250 words, which incurs a penalty. The ideas are relevant but not fully developed or extended.
Coherence & Cohesion 6.0 Your paragraphing is logical. You use linking words (Firstly, However, In conclusion) effectively. The flow is easy to follow.
Lexical Resource 5.5 Vocabulary is adequate for the task but quite basic. There are minor errors (live in abroad) and repetition of simple words (make, technology, life).
Grammatical Range 5.0 You use a mix of simple and compound sentences. However, there are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement (it make, technology help) and missing articles.
Overall Band Score 5.5

2. What You Did Well

  • Clear Position: You explicitly stated that you “partly agree” and clearly explained your middle-ground solution (using technology wisely).
  • Structure: You followed a standard essay structure: Introduction → The problem (complexity) → The benefit (necessity) → The solution → Conclusion.
  • Relevance: All your points were directly related to the question.

3. Specific Mistakes with Corrections

Here are the most critical errors to fix to improve your grammar score:

A. Subject-Verb Agreement (Crucial for Band 6+)

  • Original: “it make our life…” / “Technology help us…” / “technology make our work…”
  • Correction: “it makes our life…” / “Technology helps us…” / “technology makes our work…”
  • Rule: He/She/It (singular subjects) needs an ’s’ on the verb.

B. Articles (a/an/the)

  • Original: “live simple life” / “use smartphone” / “without computer”
  • Correction: “live a simple life” / “use a smartphone” / “without computers” (or a computer).

C. Sentence Structure & Plurals

  • Original: “people always checking their phone…”
  • Correction: “people are always checking their phone…” (Present Continuous needs the ‘be’ verb).
  • Original: “too many application and website”
  • Correction: “too many applications and websites” (Plural).

D. Word Choice

  • Original: “live in abroad”
  • Correction: “live abroad” (Abroad is an adverb; it does not take ‘in’).

4. One Paragraph Rewritten (Band 8+ Level)

Your original paragraph:

Firstly, technology has made our life more complex in some ways. For example, people always checking their phone and social media, and they cannot relax properly. Moreover, there are too many application and website that we need to remember password for. This is very stressful for many people specially older generation. My grandmother always complain that she cannot understand how to use smartphone.

Rewritten version (Band 8+):

Admittedly, the ubiquity of modern technology has introduced a layer of unnecessary complexity to our daily existence. For instance, the constant connectivity provided by smartphones has created a culture where individuals feel compelled to check social media incessantly, preventing genuine relaxation. Furthermore, the digital landscape requires us to manage a multitude of accounts and passwords, which creates a significant cognitive load. This “digital clutter” can be particularly overwhelming for the older generation, who may struggle to adapt to the rapid pace of technological evolution, leading to feelings of exclusion rather than convenience.

Why is this better?

  • Vocabulary: Used ubiquity, incessantly, cognitive load, digital clutter.
  • Grammar: Used complex sentences (…created a culture where individuals…).
  • Development: Explains why checking phones is bad (prevents genuine relaxation) rather than just stating it happens.

5. Three Vocabulary Upgrades

To push your Lexical Resource score higher, try swapping these common words:

  1. “Make complex” → “Complicate” or “Overwhelm”

    • Example: “Technology can overwhelm us with information.”

  2. “Live without” → “Abstain from” or “Forego”

    • Example: “It is impractical to completely abstain from using the internet.”

  3. “Advantage and disadvantage” → “Merits and drawbacks” or “Pros and cons”

    • Example: “We must weigh the merits and drawbacks of digital devices.”

Copy This Prompt for Your Own Practice

Want to test your own essay? Copy this prompt and try it with ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini:

You are an IELTS examiner. Evaluate my Task 2 essay.

The task is:
[PASTE ESSAY QUESTION HERE]

My response:
[PASTE YOUR ESSAY HERE]

Evaluate based on:
- Task Response (Did I fully address all parts? Is my position clear throughout?)
- Coherence and Cohesion (Is the essay well-organized? Are ideas logically connected?)
- Lexical Resource (Is vocabulary varied and precise? Are there spelling errors?)
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy (Are sentences varied? Are there grammatical errors?)

Give me:
1. Estimated band score for each criterion
2. Overall band score
3. What I did well
4. Specific mistakes with corrections
5. One paragraph rewritten at Band 8+ level
6. Three vocabulary upgrades I could use next time

For best results, try all three AI tools and compare their feedback. Each one catches different errors.

Have questions about using AI for IELTS preparation? Leave a comment below or try Lingo Copilot Speaking for AI-powered IELTS Speaking practice with detailed feedback.

Tags

IELTS writing AI feedbackChatGPT IELTSGemini IELTSAI IELTSClaude IELTSAI IELTS prep

Ready to Improve Your IELTS Speaking Score?

Get personalized AI-powered feedback and practice with our speaking coach.

Start Free Trial
Back to Blog